March 2005
This_months_webpage.GIF (953 bytes)
Online e-discussion: improving education through contracting out services
Maori doing well in industry training programmes
Analysis of NCEA results highlights arbitrary nature of exam results
Research aims to find key to helping boys succeed at school
UK specialist schools show strong improvement
Education Forum website revamped
How to reform an education system - answers unveiled
Fee-paying student numbers soar in Australia
Ban lifted on university fees in Germany
'More hits than Motown' at Education New Zealand website
Quote of the month
Outside intervention prompts fast turn-around for failing UK school authorities
Effective families help boost skills, study finds
Teacher quality and the market
New types of schools best way to reform education, book argues
Growing numbers of US universities running secondary schools
Growing number of US states propose rating systems for childcare centres
George Bush pushes for vouchers again
Florida looks at expanding voucher scheme, considers selling failed schools
Philadpelphia schools using outsourced curriculum do well
Vocational education research forum in Wellington next month
Universal Declaration of Human Rights often ignored in education
Two reports on student loans released this month
UK and NZ look to boost links between business and research

If you would like a paper copy of Subtext, you can print this page or click on the image above to download a pdf version of the complete newsletter.

Results improve when schools are held accountable

A new study shows student grades in reading and mathematics improve when US teachers and their schools are held accountable for the educational performance of their pupils and face consequences when children do not measure up.

'Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?' by Eric Hanushek and Margaret Raymond finds that the introduction of accountability systems leads to higher achievement growth.

This is most effective when poor educational results have real, adverse consequences for schools.

The report also finds that having educational standards and testing for primary school students has not narrowed the educational gap between blacks and whites, although it has trimmed the Hispanic-white achievement gap.

In fact, accountability increased the gap between black and white students a little, because the performance of blacks improved less than that of whites.

"Achieving multiple objectives with a single policy instrument is not generally feasible," the authors conclude.

Accountability policies have been controversial, with claims that they have led to higher drop-out rates, more cheating on tests, a narrowing of what is taught and a move to shift more students into special education classes to improve regular achievement rates.

The study finds no evidence of such effects at the state level. Between 1980 and 2001, the proportion of students assigned to special education classes rose from 10 percent to over 13 percent.

But this trend was not altered when accountability was introduced from 1995-2000 across the US.

'Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?' is at this web page.