June 2004
This_months_webpage.GIF (953 bytes)
It's school, but not as we know it
Budget's early childcare plan 'removes parental choice'
Voucher-like scheme for reading tuition in Australia
Budget gains for early childhood knocked by minister's 'anti-private-sector bias'
Too much untargeted education spending in budget, says Business NZ
Zoning is a major frustration to NZ parents, report finds
Public schools improve under competition from private schools
School choice works, says Reform Britain
Aristotle's Books: book selection
NZers rate education higher than the economy
Quote of the month
Latest student loan figures online
Apprenticeships for British 14-year-olds
British govt to invest more money in state and independent school partnerships
More US public universities going private
Japanese education's 'biggest shake-up in 100 years'
Canada surveys graduates student debt
Sylvan Learning Systems caps change into higher education with new name
Paper suggests models for public/private partnerships
Wide use of technology in education in Asia and the Pacific
Single mothers shown to be highly responsive to childcare subsidies

If you would like a paper copy of Subtext, you can print this page or click on the image above to download a pdf version of the complete newsletter.

Understanding learning differences between boys and girls

Changing how students are assessed could help to address the problem of boys dropping behind at school, a visiting educational psychologist says.

JoAnn Deak is this year's Independent Schools of New Zealand visiting scholar and spent three weeks in May working with parents, teachers and students at schools in Christchurch, Auckland and Wellington.

US-based Dr Deak said that, if judged by exam marks, boys may not be seen to be doing so well, but in terms of their conceptual- and pattern-thinking they were not doing badly.

"Girls are better at memorising and spitting back information but in terms of deeper learning I do not think it is true that there is a gap between the genders - males are still far exceeding females in business and in advanced learning there is not a gender difference," Dr Deak said.

Changing the grades-focused assessment methods at school level could be key to lifting boys' achievement. In the US, assessment methods had not changed for 50 years.

Dr Deak said New Zealand's NCEA was moving in the right direction with its mix of external and internal assessment.

It was also important to recognise and understand boys' and girls' differences "from the neck up" and to build that understanding into teaching programmes. In literacy education, for example, boys could not physically hear the difference between certain vowels until a couple of years after girls were able to.

Therefore, the phonics approach was unsuitable for boys until they could hear those sounds, and teaching boys using visual memory was the best way to start.

Dr Deak said New Zealand education had a good emphasis on "deep thinking," which boys did well at, but there was still little recognition that boys and girls should not be taught as if they were the same unit.

"The male brain uses one side at a time but a girl's brain is wired to both sides with a good connection between them. So in class, boys will do things serially whereas for girls it is not so difficult to multi-task," she said.

Dr Deak said most girls learnt better in a girls-only situation, while boys often did better in a co-educational school because they learnt from girls.

"Having males and females in a class is great if you have a really talented teacher. If not, you get problems."

  • Dr Deak has spent more than 20 years as an educator and school psychologist. The latter half of that period has focused on working with parents and teachers in their roles as guides for children.

Dr Deak's website and her biography.