Hot Topic
Hot Topic 8
Education Forum, 06 May 2003
Budgeting for education success
The Australian Budget on 13 May 2003 announced many reforms for the tertiary education sector that place it on a more market-based footing.
The Australian Department of Education, Science and Training website provides all the details on the proposed Australian higher education reforms, including the background reports prepared as part of the Crossroads review process. It can be accessed here: http://www.backingaustraliasfuture.gov.au/
The Howard Government Budget provides a record AU$69.8 billion over the next four years for education, training and science. Funding in 2003-04 totals more than AU$15.8 billion, an increase of 6.1% over the amount available for these sectors in the previous year. Budget information at a glance highlights the main spending.
The website of the Australian Minister for Education Science and Training, Brendan Nelson, has a page with links to information on all the Australian Budget education initiatives.
|
The Australiansays fees could increase by up to a third for students beginning undergraduate degrees in 2005, and twice as many full-fee places will be available. The Agereports that Dr Nelson wants universities to be run in a business-like fashion. The Sydney Morning Heraldreports that an extra $404 million in funding is linked to a ban on strikes. Students and business groups react to the Budget. The Australian Labor Party says it will join with the minor parties to block changes to higher education announced in the Budget. Australian vice-chancellors have commended the government on the reforms, saying they will help with inadequate resources and previously inflexible policies. An Education Forum press release says the Australian initiatives could be a pointer for New Zealand tertiary education. "The Australian higher education reforms are a timely reminder that New Zealand's policy framework needs to be 'world-class'. While the government here has introduced some useful tertiary reforms, other changes it has made are increasingly at odds with global trends and world best-practice," Education Forum policy advisor Norman LaRocque says. A report from Mr LaRocque released earlier this year discusses who should pay for tertiary education in New Zealand. The report argues that students, rather than taxpayers, should foot more of the bill for tertiary education. "If it is unfair for students to pay more of the cost, as some argue, then it is even more unfair to ask taxpayers to foot the bill given that students are, on average, from wealthier households than taxpayers generally and that students enjoy the bulk of the benefits from tertiary education, including higher lifetime earnings," Mr LaRocque has said. |
|
An Education Forum feature looks at a report, released in February by the Centre for Independent Studies, that calls for tertiary education reform in Australia.
Report author Andrew Norton has said that Australian universities face serious financial and educational difficulties if reform is not introduced and that the best reform would be to let universities set their own fees to get the income needed to keep quality up.